So… You Think I’m a Chick…
Comments
The nature.com article reveals in greater detail, sorry that I missed that one first. It’s even stupider.
And this is the best part!!
So this article would already, through sentences such as this, have probably betrayed its author as male: there is a prevalence of plural pronouns (they, them), indicating the male tendency to categorize rather than personalize.
Gender Genie reports his article as female.
I ran all sorts of text through and I found it to be roughly 80% accurate to the gender. The wierd thing is that my friend Eric kept coming out female, no matter how I ran his writing through.
Oh yeah, I also ran THE BIBLE through and found the word of God to be “male”. The research is all on the blog if anyone’s interested…
OMG what a retarded algorithm. Did you go to the NY Times article that described it? It is basically assuming that males like to use the word “the” a lot, and hardly ever use the word “with” as well as not using possessive pronouns.
That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard, and as you proved, isn’t even consisent between writings of an individual author.
Sounds on par for something the NYT would report as “news” though.
By Derek Jones on August 21, 2003 at 02:19pm link