What You Can’t Say

Paul Graham writes a relatively long, but very interesting essay about social taboos or what I think he aptly calls moral fashions.  He doesn’t really focus on the moral fashions (taboos) directly because he doesn’t want to lose the broader point.  Instead, he discusses ways that we might try to identify our current moral fashions; the ones that people in the future will look back on and be amazed.  Or, as he puts it:

If you could travel back in a time machine, one thing would be true no matter where you went: you’d have to watch what you said.

It’s good stuff and I figure it ought to get you thinking…

This is an older entry and as such, it may be by a guest author or contain formatting problems / extraneous code. If you notice something wrong with the entry, please use the Contact page to let me know the entry title and issue.

Comments

Is this a dig at my post today?  You working for Ashcroft or the RIAA now?? :o

Um… as Paul says in his essay, I’m going to answer with “Neither.” wink

And, actually, if anything I think this idea of moral fashions would support what you wrote about earlier.

Is this guy related to billy grahm? seriously...?

Paul Graham’s article is very interesting and thought provoking. It seems increasingly rare to read such cools ideas about something that isn’t out to offend you. I pick up on this path of least resistence style of “what you can’t say”. I think it really comes across. Paul shows non-conformist thinking in a whole new light. 

Leave Your Comment

Comments may be edited for content or deleted at any time. Civilized discussion is welcome. Anyone spamming, going way off topic, or otherwise being a jerk will probably be deleted or banned.

User Information

pMcode is allowed for comment formatting. pop-up mini reference

Personalization Options

Comment Security